United States v. James (Roy Lee), A/K/A 'Big Man', 917 F.2d 28 (9th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
United States v. James (Roy Lee), A/K/A 'Big Man', 917 F.2d 28 (9th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: (PC) Donaldson v. Garland (caed, 2021-12-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) (PC) Donaldson v. Garland
E.D. Cal. · 2021 · confidence medium
Plaintiff does not do so; 24 rather, he points to the delay in treatment, and simply incorporates his prior factual allegations. 25 For example, plaintiff alleges that defendant Potichkin insisted the surgery had to be cancelled for 26 5 While certain torts are excluded from the FTCA as a matter of law under 28 U.S.C. § 2680 (h), 27 the Ninth Circuit has held that “the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress is not excluded.” Sheehan v. United States, 896 F.2d 1168, 1172 (9th Cir. 1990), as amended, 917 F.2d 28 424 (9th Cir. 1990). 1 plaintiff’s safety and security based on…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
James (Roy Lee), A/K/A 'Big Man'
89-10488_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 24, 1990.
917 F.2d 28
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

917 F.2d 28

U.S.
v.
James (Roy Lee), a/k/a 'Big Man'

NOS. 89-10488, 89-10490

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

OCT 24, 1990

1

Appeal From: D.Nev.

2

AFFIRMED.