Dugger Harris v. Clayton Yeutter, Sec'y of Agric., 923 F.2d 200 (D.C. Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Dugger Harris v. Clayton Yeutter, Sec'y of Agric., 923 F.2d 200 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“proximate cause is that cause which, in actual continuous sequence, unbroken by an efficient intervening cause, produces the injury and without which the injury would not have occurred.”
21 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Yang v. Spahn (dcd, 2023-02-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Yang v. Spahn
D.D.C. · 2023 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
proximate cause is that cause which, in actual continuous sequence, unbroken by an efficient intervening cause, produces the injury and without which the injury would not have occurred.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dugger Harris
v.
Clayton Yeutter, Secretary of Agriculture
90-5027.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Oct 15, 1990.
923 F.2d 200
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)

923 F.2d 200

287 U.S.App.D.C. 377

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Dugger HARRIS,
v.
Clayton YEUTTER, Secretary of Agriculture.

No. 90-5027.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 15, 1990.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and HARRY T. EDWARDS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto, it is

2

ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinions filed July 7, 1989 and November 29, 1989. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers' Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.