green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp. v. Ryan
See Sunbelt Savings, FSB Dallas, Texas v. Montross, 923 F.2d 353, 356-57 (5th Cir.) (federal holder-in-due-course protection does not extend to nonnegotiable instruments), rehearing en banc granted, 932 F.2d 363 , opinion reinstated in pertinent part, 944 F.2d 227 (5th Cir.1991). 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SUNBELT SAVINGS, FSB DALLAS, TEXAS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
George Michael MONTROSS, Defendant-Appellant
v.
George Michael MONTROSS, Defendant-Appellant
90-1510.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 15, 1991.
Marc S. Culp, Sheehan, Young & Culp, P.C., Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellant., Robert D. Daniel, Hirsch & Westheimer, Houston, Tex., for amicus NCNB Texas Nat. Bank., Richard J. Osterman, Jr., F.D.I.C., Washington, D.C., for amicus F.D.I.C., William S. Montgomery, Houston, Tex., for amicus Montgomery & Montgomery., John Edwards, Thomas E. Kurth, Jeffrey S. Rosenblum, Haynes & Booth, Dallas, Tex., for Sunbelt Sav., FSB.
, Barksdale, Clark, Davis, Duhe, Jolly, King, Politz, Smith, Wiener.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. * BY THE COURT:A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the[*364] judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.