David L. Hunter, Cross-Appellee v. J.T. Anderson, Officer, Eugene Rush, City of Ypsilanti Police Officer, Cross-Appellants, Robert Huff, Chief, Charles Kirby, Lieutenant, City of Ypsilanti, a Mun. Corp., Ypsilanti Police Dep't, 932 F.2d 968 (6th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
David L. Hunter, Cross-Appellee v. J.T. Anderson, Officer, Eugene Rush, City of Ypsilanti Police Officer, Cross-Appellants, Robert Huff, Chief, Charles Kirby, Lieutenant, City of Ypsilanti, a Mun. Corp., Ypsilanti Police Dep't, 932 F.2d 968 (6th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“vague admonition to maintain 'the lowest possible rates' does not come close to providing the sort of guidelines which would permit meaningful judicial review”
40 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Chicago Teachers Union v. DeVos (ilnd, 2020-06-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Chicago Teachers Union v. DeVos
N.D. Ill. · 2020 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
vague admonition to maintain 'the lowest possible rates' does not come close to providing the sort of guidelines which would permit meaningful judicial review
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In re Nat'l Prescription Opiate Litig.
N.D. Ohio · 2018 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
private documents collected during discovery are not judicial records....
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Pappas
E.D. Mich. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See McMurry v. Morton S. Scholnick & Ass’n Mgmt., 932 F.2d 968 (6th Cir. 1991) (finding that the district court did not err in granting motion for summary judgment where response brief was filed without any supporting affidavits or other evidence and noting that “a party may not simply rest on her pleadings in response to a motion for summary judgment.” (citing Fed.
cited Cited "see" Huron Mountain Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
6th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
Id. at 838 , 105 S.Ct. 1649 ; see Matthews v. Town of Greeneville, 932 F.2d 968 (6th Cir.1991) (table).
cited Cited "see" In Re Pioneer Investment Services Company, Debtor. The Cain Partnership, Ltd. v. Pioneer Investment Services Company
6th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See McNally v. MacDonald, 932 F.2d 968 , 1991 WL 73247 at * 2-3 (6th Cir.1991) (unpublished per curiam); Reynolds v. Humko Prods., 756 F.2d 469, 473 (6th Cir.1985).
cited Cited "see, e.g." David Holbrook v. Tennessee Valley Authority
4th Cir. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ala. 1974); see also Matthews v. Town of Greeneville, 932 F.2d 968 , 1991 WL 71414, *4 (6th Cir. 1991) (unpublished).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David L. Hunter, Cross-Appellee
v.
J.T. Anderson, Officer, Eugene Rush, City of Ypsilanti Police Officer, Cross-Appellants, Robert Huff, Chief, Charles Kirby, Lieutenant, City of Ypsilanti, a Municipal Corporation, Ypsilanti Police Department
91-1225.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
May 13, 1991.
932 F.2d 968
Unpublished
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (1) · N.D. Ohio (1)

932 F.2d 968

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
David L. HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross-Appellee,
v.
J.T. ANDERSON, Officer, Eugene Rush, City of Ypsilanti
Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants,
Robert Huff, Chief, Charles Kirby, Lieutenant, City of
Ypsilanti, a municipal corporation, Ypsilanti
Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 91-1225, 91-1263.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 13, 1991.

1

Before DAVID A. NELSON and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and ALDRICH, District Judge.[*]

ORDER

2

On January 10, 1991, the district court entered an order in this civil rights action denying the pro se plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment except as to a claim of excessive force against defendants Anderson and Rush. The plaintiff's appeal from that order was docketed with this court as Case No. 91-1225. The cross-appeal by Anderson and Rush was docketed as Case No. 91-1263.

3

On April 15, 1991, a panel of this court sua sponte dismissed Case No. 91-1225 for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's order was neither final for purposes of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 nor certified for an interlocutory appeal under Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. A review of the remaining cross-appeal reveals no independent basis for appellate jurisdiction which would cure the deficiencies found in Case No. 91-1225.

4

It therefore is ORDERED that Case No. 91-1263 is dismissed sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction herein.

*

The Honorable Ann Aldrich, District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation