People v. White, 28 N.Y.3d 1128 (NY 2016). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. White, 28 N.Y.3d 1128 (NY 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Agee (nyappdiv, 2022-06-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Agee
N.Y. App. Div. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
We reject that contention. "[T]he O'Rama procedure is not implicated when the jury's request is ministerial in nature and therefore requires only a ministerial response" ( People v Nealon , 26 NY3d 152, 161 [2015]; see People v Williams , 142 AD3d 1360 , 1362 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1128 [2016]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Edwards
N.Y. App. Div. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
We reject that contention. " '[T]he O'Rama procedure is not implicated when the jury's request is ministerial in nature and therefore requires only a ministerial response' " ( People v Nealon , 26 NY3d 152, 161 [2015]; see People v Williams , 142 AD3d 1360, 1362 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1128 [2016]; People v Lewis , 140 AD3d 1593 , 1595 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1029 [2016]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Paul
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
Two of the notes at issue, concerning a juror's request to meet privately with the judge, were ministerial in nature ( see People v Brito , 135 AD3d 627, 627-628 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1066 [2016]). "[T]he O'Rama procedure is not implicated when the jury's request is ministerial in nature and therefore requires only a ministerial response" ( People v Nealon , 26 NY3d 152, 161 [2015]; see People v Williams , 142 AD3d 1360 , 1362 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1128 [2016]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Paul
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
Two of the notes at issue, concerning a juror's request to meet privately with the judge, were ministerial in nature ( see People v Brito , 135 AD3d 627, 627-628 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1066 [2016]). "[T]he O'Rama procedure is not implicated [where, as here,] the jury's request is ministerial in nature and therefore requires only a ministerial response" ( People v Nealon , 26 NY3d 152, 161 [2015]; see People v Williams , 142 AD3d 1360 , 1362 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1128 [2016]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Ramsey
N.Y. App. Div. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
We previously affirmed the judgment of conviction ( People v Ramsey , 199 AD2d 985 [4th Dept 1993], lv denied 83 NY2d 857 [1994]), and now conclude that defendant has not met his burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the consecutive sentencing was "unauthorized, illegally imposed or otherwise invalid as a matter of law" (CPL 440.20 [1]; see People v Young , 143 AD3d 1242, 1243 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1128 [2016]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Cotton
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the court properly admitted the testimony of an eyewitness concerning his pretrial photo identification of defendant for the purpose of correcting “a misapprehension created by the defense regarding the issue of identification” (People v Robinson, 5 AD3d 1077, 1078 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 805 [2004] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Williams, 142 AD3d 1360 , 1361 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1128 [2017]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
People
v.
White (Jonathan)
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 31, 2016.
28 N.Y.3d 1128
Published

3d Dept: 142 AD3d 1254 (Warren)

denied 12/30/16 (Fahey, J.)