discussed Cited "see" People v. Murray Contrary to defendant's specific contention, even if he did not personally complete and sign each claim form, the evidence is legally sufficient to establish that he " cause[d] to be presented" a written statement containing materially false information in support of a claim for payment pursuant to an insurance policy (Penal Law § 176.05 [emphasis added]; see § 176.20) and " cause[d] a false entry in the business records of an enterprise" (§ 175.05 [1] [emphasis added]; see § 175.10) by meeting with the insurance company's representative and submitting to him the forms that were to be file…

discussed Cited "see" People v. Spencer Here, the [*2]court "accorded defendant a reasonable opportunity to present his contentions and did not abuse its discretion in concluding that no further inquiry was necessary' " ( People v Harris , 142 AD3d 1391, 1392 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1124 [2016]; see People v Alfred , 142 AD3d 1373 , 1373 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1142 [2017]).

discussed Cited "see" People v. Martinez Contrary to defendant's related contention, we conclude that "[defense] counsel's statement[s], in response to . . . inquir[ies] from the court, that the sentence promise had been set forth clearly at the time of the plea[ and that defendant had previously been informed of his maximum sentencing exposure], [were] not adversarial' toward defendant . . . , [inasmuch as defense] counsel was simply reiterating what was already a matter of record, which was the court's own recollection as well" ( People v Benitez , 290 AD2d 363 , 365 [1st Dept 2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 673 [2002]; see People v Alvar…