Schwartz v. Colorfilm, Inc., 176 N.E.2d 506 (NY 1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Schwartz v. Colorfilm, Inc., 176 N.E.2d 506 (NY 1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Irving M. Schwartz, Doing Business as Acme Trading Company
v.
Colorfilm, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals.
May 18, 1961.
176 N.E.2d 506
Richard Lieb and Evalyn Lipton for motion., James E. Mathias opposed.
Published

[*970] Motion denied, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements, upon the ground that the determination sought to be reviewed involves a pure question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals (Trapani v. Samuels, 3 N Y 2d 931).