In re the Arbitration between Bauer Int'l Corp. & Etablissements Soules & Cie, 250 N.E.2d 876 (NY 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
In re the Arbitration between Bauer Int'l Corp. & Etablissements Soules & Cie, 250 N.E.2d 876 (NY 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Spliethoff Transport B.V. v. Phyto-Charter Inc. (nysd, 2021-05-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Spliethoff Transport B.V. v. Phyto-Charter Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 2021 · confidence medium
Likewise, in Bauer International Corp. v. Establissements Soules & Cie, the New York Court of Appeals rejected an appellant’s argument “that the mere cryptic phrase ‘Arbitration in New York’ did not constitute a written agreement to submit any controversy . . . to arbitration.” 25 N.Y.2d 871, 872 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Bauer International Corporation, and Etablissements Soules & Cie.
New York Court of Appeals.
Jul 2, 1969.
250 N.E.2d 876
Herbert Rubin, Bernard J. Wald and Michael Hoenig for appellant., Mark D. Lebow and Luden R. Le Lievre for Etablissements Soules & Cie., respondent., Geoffrey M. Kalmus for Interamerican E and I Corporation and others, respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Concur: Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Taking no part: Chief Judge Fuld.