United States v. Bruce C. Fox, 943 F.2d 1218 (10th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
United States v. Bruce C. Fox, 943 F.2d 1218 (10th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: United States v. Carlos Jesus Garcia (ca10, 1994-11-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Carlos Jesus Garcia
10th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Fox, 930 F.2d 820, 824 (10th Cir.), opinion after remand, 943 F.2d 1218 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 218 , 116 L.Ed.2d 176 (1991). 3 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Robert Sain McHenry
10th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence medium
United States v. Soto, 918 F.2d 882 , 883 & n. 2 (10th Cir.1990) (citing cases); see also United States v. Fox, 943 F.2d 1218, 1218 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 218 , 116 L.Ed.2d 176 (1991); United States v. Bromberg, 933 F.2d 895, 896 (10th Cir.1991); United States v. Lowden, 905 F.2d 1448, 1449 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 206 , 112 L.Ed.2d 166 (1990); United States v. Richardson, 901 F.2d 867, 870 (10th Cir.1990) (citing cases); United States v. Davis, 900 F.2d 1524, 1528-30 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 155 , 112 L.Ed.2d 121 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bruce C. FOX, Defendant-Appellant
90-2048.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Aug 29, 1991.
943 F.2d 1218
Holloway, Ebel, Nottingham.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

Defendant appealed the district court’s sentence following a guilty plea. By opinion filed April 18, 1991, 930 F.2d 820, this court affirmed defendant’s sentence in part but remanded the cause to the district court to clarify the reason for its refusal to depart downward from the Guidelines. The court now has for consideration the district court’s clarification dated August 13, 1991.

In view of the district court’s statement that it exercised discretion in denying a downward department, despite the Guideline authority for such departure, this court lacks jurisdiction to review that discretionary decision. See U.S. v. Soto, 918 F.2d 882, 883-84 (10th Cir.1990).

Therefore, in accordance with the court’s April 18, 1991, opinion and this order, the court affirms the sentence imposed by the district court.