green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Auslander v. Khattab
Hardeman v. Mendon Leasing Corp., 447 N.E.2d 47, 48 , 58 N.Y.2d 892 , 460 N.Y.S.2d 499, 500 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ames v. Cross
Group Co., 35 NY2d 260, 264 , quoting Continental Auto Lease Corp. v Campbell, 19 NY2d 350, 352 ; see, Hardeman v Mendon Leasing Corp., 87 AD2d 232, 237 , affd 58 NY2d 892 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guss Hardeman
v.
Mendon Leasing Corp.
v.
Mendon Leasing Corp.
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 15, 1983.
447 N.E.2d 47
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Harry Organek and Howard S. Davis for appellant., Norman Bard for respondent.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (87 AD2d 232). We add that (1) subdivision 3 of section 388 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law expressly makes the liability of lessor and lessee joint and several, and (2) there was no due process violation because the lessor’s agent gave permission in fact and had the authority under Hendon’s contract with Midtown to refuse to do so.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.