Bisca v. Bisca, 488 N.E.2d 111 (NY 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Bisca v. Bisca, 488 N.E.2d 111 (NY 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gumowitz v. Mazoh (nyappdiv, 1994-03-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Gumowitz v. Mazoh
N.Y. App. Div. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a sanction of $750 against plaintiffs for failing to answer responsively all of defendants’ interrogatories, where their motion for a protective order had previously been denied, and where they frivolously cross-moved for sanctions (22 NYCRR 130-1.1; see, Gabrelian v Gabrelian, 108 AD2d 445, 448 , appeal dismissed 66 NY2d 741 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mink v. Conifer Park, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
Teitelbaum’s conduct during the course of Silverman’s questioning of plaintiff, including his insulting comments to Silverman and his constant, meritless interruptions, constitute sufficient obstructive behavior warranting a sanction by the court (see, White v Martins, 100 AD2d 805 ; see also, Gabrelian v Gabrelian, 108 AD2d 445, 448, 454 , appeal dismissed 66 NY2d 741 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert A. Bisca
v.
Lois Bisca, (Action No. 1.) Lois Bisca v. Robert A. Bisca, (Action No. 2.)
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 22, 1985.
488 N.E.2d 111
Published

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the modification at the Appellate Division is not in a respect reviewable by the Court of Appeals (CPLR 5601 [a] [iii]; Patron v Patron, 40 NY2d 582).