No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nathaniel Abdullah
v.
City of New York
v.
City of New York
New York Court of Appeals.
May 2, 1996.
667 N.E.2d 334
Published
Motion for leave to appeal and motion for reargument, insofar as the motions are made by Nathaniel Abdullah[*866] purportedly on behalf of Garry Williams, dismissed upon the ground that Abdullah is not Williams’ authorized legal representative; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for reargument otherwise dismissed as untimely. [See, 84 NY2d 1018; 85 NY2d 954.]