People v. Artist, 745 N.E.2d 384 (NY 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Artist, 745 N.E.2d 384 (NY 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Philip Malachi Artist
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 14, 2000.
745 N.E.2d 384
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York City (Joseph M. Nursey and Richard M. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant., Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Deborah L. Morse, Mark Dwyer and Susan Gliner of counsel), for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

[*945] The record demonstrates that defendant’s argument, that he was denied his right to a jury trial and due process as a result of the substitution of the Trial Judge during jury deliberations, is unpreserved (see, People v Tonge, 93 NY2d 838, 839-840; People v Thompson, 90 NY2d 615, 621). Defendant’s argument that the substitute Judge failed to exercise her discretion in ruling that the jury could not be released from sequestration is similarly unpreserved (see, People v Shaw, 90 NY2d 879, 880).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.