Louis Osei Cotton v. Michael Redmon, 951 F.2d 1258 (10th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Louis Osei Cotton v. Michael Redmon, 951 F.2d 1258 (10th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. Panagakos (mad, 1998-05-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. Panagakos
D. Mass. · 1998 · confidence medium
Dunkin’ Donuts, citing Aircraft Sales of Cal. Inc. v. Insured Aircraft Title Service, Inc., 951 F.2d 1258, 1260 (10th Cir.1991), also argues that Panagakos's late-blooming recollection should be treated as a recent fabrication because Panaga-kos made no reference to Coba’s supposed statement in his two letters of expiration to Dunkin’ Donuts when it "would be expected that some mention [of the statement] would have been made.” 16 .
discussed Cited "see" Zilberberg v. Comm'r
Tax Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. *17 Pursuant to section 165(h) , the casualty loss deduction is allowed only to the extent that the loss from each casualty exceeds $100 and to the extent that the net casualty loss for the taxable year "exceeds 10 percent of the adjusted gross income" for that taxable year. 10 The amount of the casualty loss allowed under section 165 is the lesser of: (1) The fair market value of the property immediately before the casualty reduced by the fair market value of the property immediately after the casualty or (2) "The *18 amount of the adjusted basis prescribed" in section 1.1011-1, Incom…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louis Osei Cotton
v.
Michael Redmon
91-3201.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Dec 20, 1991.
951 F.2d 1258
Published

951 F.2d 1258

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Louis Osei COTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael REDMON, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-3201.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 20, 1991.

Before McKAY, Chief Judge, SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT[*]

McKAY, Chief Judge.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. We grant appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and proceed to consider the merits of the appeal.

2

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Lansing Correctional Facility in Lansing, Kansas, brought suit in federal district court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claimed that the attorney appointed to defend him against a murder charge provided inadequate representation, thereby depriving him of a fundamental constitutional right. After considering plaintiff's allegations, the district court found that plaintiff's claims were insufficient to proceed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and dismissed the action. Plaintiff appeals that decision to this court.

3

After a thorough review of the record and the pleadings, we AFFIRM the decision of the district court for substantially the reasons set forth in the district court order dated May 16, 1991.

4

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3