neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.5 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edge
v.
State
v.
State
2772.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jul 25, 1910.
Clay & Morris, for plaintiff in error., J. P. Brooke, solicitor-general, contra.
Hill.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Hill, C. J.
1. That the.panel of jurors heard the argument on the trial of one jointly indicted with the defendant is not a ground for challenge to the array; nor is it ground for peremptory challenge to the poll. The objection goes to the qualification of each juror, and is fully met by the questions and answers on the voir dire, where there is no other or fuller investigation before the judge as a trior.
2. No error of law appears, and the evidence fully supports the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Indictment for arson; from Cobb superior court — Judge Morris. June 1, 1910. Clay & Morris, for plaintiff in error. J. P. Brooke, solicitor-general, contra.