Dixon v. City of Waynesboro, 74 S.E. 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Dixon v. City of Waynesboro, 74 S.E. 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.2 score

3 citation events across 1 distinct court.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Dixon
v.
City of Waynesboro

3951.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Mar 19, 1912.

74 S.E. 302

10 Ga. App. 801

1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 697

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

C. B. Garlick, for plaintiff in error., E. L. Brinson, contra.

Hill.

Published

Hill, C. J.

This being' a certiorari sued out to réview the judgment of a

municipal court, and there being in the petition no averment that the bond required by the act approved December 10, 1902 (Acts 1902, p. 105), had been given, or the pauper affidavit filed, and it nowhere appearing in the record that the bond or the pauper affidavit had been filed, there was' no error in dismissing tbe certiorari. McDonald v. Ludowici, 3 Ga. App. 654; Allen v. Atlanta, 7 Ga. App. 99; Veassey v. Crawfordville, 126 Ga. 89. . Judgment affirmed.