United States v. R.G. Reynolds, A/K/A Richard Fernando Gonzales, A/K/A Richard Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192 (9th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. R.G. Reynolds, A/K/A Richard Fernando Gonzales, A/K/A Richard Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192 (9th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm”
21 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Giampa (njd, 1995-08-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) United States v. Giampa (2×) also: Cited as authority (rule)
D.N.J. · 1995 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Brandon Ball
9th Cir. · 2022 · confidence medium
But as the government argued, the district court’s dangerousness finding makes the court’s error harmless.2 See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 734 (1993) (noting that an error “must have affected the outcome of the district court proceedings”). “[D]anger [to the community] may, at least in some cases, 2 Because we find the dangerousness analysis sufficient for denying compassionate release, we do not reach the other alleged abuses of discretion regarding the district court’s conflation of the two steps of 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(1)(A)(i), or its findings on COVID-19 reinfectio…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rahman v. United States
D. Nev. · 2020 · confidence medium
The 4 Ninth Circuit has held “that danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or 5 economic harm.” United States v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192, 192 (9th Cir. 1992). 6 Pursuant to § 3142(g), the Court first considers the nature and circumstances of the 7 offense for which Defendant was convicted.
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Nicholas Lindsey
9th Cir. · 2017 · confidence medium
In United States v. Reynolds, we held that “danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm.” 956 F.2d 192, 192 (9th Cir. 1992) (order).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Nicholas Lindsey
9th Cir. · 2016 · confidence medium
In United States v. Reynolds, we held that “danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm.” 956 F.2d 192, 192 (9th Cir. 1992).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Bryant v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2012 · confidence medium
We believe that ‘danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm.’ ” (quoting United States v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192, 192-93 (9th Cir.1992))).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jones v. State (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
The court specifically held that "`danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm.'" Id. at 644 (quoting U.S. v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192, 192-93 (9th Cir.1992)); see also id. at 645 (concluding that there is "nothing in the language of section 775.082(10) that suggests that the Legislature intended to limit the meaning of `danger to the public' only to persons threatening physical violence or injury").
discussed Cited as authority (rule) McCloud v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
We believe that “danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm.” United States v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192, 192-93 (9th Cir.1992); see United States v. Provenzano, 605 F.2d 85, 95 (3rd Cir.1979) (explaining that danger is not limited to physical harm; concept includes opportunity to exercise substantial and corrupting influence within labor un *645 ion); United States v. Parr, 399.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Madoff (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 2009 · confidence medium
The Government identifies United States v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192 (9th Cir.1992), which asserts that “danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm.” Id. at 192 (referencing United States v. Provenzano, 605 F.2d 85, 95 (3rd Cir.1979) (danger not limited to physical harm; the concept includes the opportunity to exercise a substantial and corrupting influence within a labor union)); see also United States v. Parr, 399 F.Supp. 883, 888 (W.D.Tex.1975) (“The ‘danger to ... the community’ [language in the Bail Reform Act] permits consideration of the defendant’…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Bissell
D.N.J. · 1997 · confidence medium
When assessing danger to the community, “ ‘danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm.’ ” Id. at 1161 (quoting United States v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192, 192 (9th Cir. 1992)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Bertoli (2×) also: Cited "see"
D.N.J. · 1994 · confidence medium
Danger to the Community When assessing danger to the community, “danger may, at least in some eases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm.” United States v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192, 192 (9th Cir.1992) (denying bail pending appeal to defendant convicted of mail fraud); see United States v. Provenzano, 605 F.2d 85, 95 (3d Cir.1979) (“We ... hold that a defendant’s propensity to commit crime generally, even if the resulting harm would not be solely physical, may constitute a sufficient risk of danger to come within the contemplation of the Act.”); United States v. Leonetti, No. Crim. 88-…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Madoff
2d Cir. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., United States v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192, 192-93 (9th Cir.1992) (order) (“[D]anger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm.”).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Madoff
2d Cir. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., United States v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192, 192-93 (9th Cir.1992) (order) (“[D]anger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
R.G. REYNOLDS, A/K/A Richard Fernando Gonzales, A/K/A Richard Reynolds, Defendant-Appellant
92-50017, 92-50032.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jan 29, 1992.
956 F.2d 192
Wallace, Sneed, Alarcon.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (1)

ORDER

A jury convicted appellant R.G. Reynolds of 13 counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and two counts of witness tampering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(2)(B). On December 16,1991, the district court sentenced him to 14 years imprisonment, five years probation, and restitution of over $400,000.

On December 23, 1991, the district court denied Reynolds’ motion for bail pending appeal on the grounds that Reynolds failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he was not a danger to the community and had also failed to raise a substantial question on appeal. See 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b). The district court also found that Reynolds had violated the terms of his pretrial release. Reynolds filed a timely notice of appeal from the judgment and commitment order and now moves for bail pending appeal.

We agree with the district court that Reynolds has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he does not constitute an economic danger to the community. We further hold that danger may, at least in some cases, encompass pecuniary or economic harm. See United States v. Proven [*193] zano, 605 F.2d 85, 95 (3rd Cir.1979) (danger not limited to physical harm; the concept includes the opportunity to exercise a substantial and corrupting influence within a labor union); United States v. Parr, 399 F.Supp. 883, 888 (W.D.Tex.1975) (pecuniary harm). Therefore, appellant’s motion for bail pending appeal, filed in appeal No. 92-50017, is denied.

Reynolds filed a second notice of appeal from the district court order denying bail pending appeal, appeal No. 92-50032. The district court order denying bail pending appeal is not a final appealable order and therefore, we dismiss appeal No. 92-50032 for lack of jurisdiction.