18 U.S.C. § 3143

Release or detention of a defendant pending sentence or appeal

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)Release or Detention Pending Sentence.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the judicial officer shall order that a person who has been found guilty of an offense and who is awaiting imposition or execution of sentence, other than a person for whom the applicable guideline promulgated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994 does not recommend a term of imprisonment, be detained, unless the judicial officer finds by clear and convincing evidence that the person is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under section 3142(b) or (c). If the judicial officer makes such a finding, such judicial officer shall order the release of the person in accordance with section 3142(b) or (c).(2) The judicial officer shall order that a person who has been found guilty of an offense in a case described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of subsection (f)(1) of section 3142 and is awaiting imposition or execution of sentence be detained unless—(A)(i) the judicial officer finds there is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted; or(ii) an attorney for the Government has recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed on the person; and(B) the judicial officer finds by clear and convincing evidence that the person is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community.(b)Release or Detention Pending Appeal by the Defendant.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the judicial officer shall order that a person who has been found guilty of an offense and sentenced to a term of imprisonment, and who has filed an appeal or a petition for a writ of certiorari, be detained, unless the judicial officer finds—(A) by clear and convincing evidence that the person is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under section 3142(b) or (c) of this title; and(B) that the appeal is not for the purpose of delay and raises a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in—(i) reversal,(ii) an order for a new trial,(iii) a sentence that does not include a term of imprisonment, or(iv) a reduced sentence to a term of imprisonment less than the total of the time already served plus the expected duration of the appeal process.If the judicial officer makes such findings, such judicial officer shall order the release of the person in accordance with section 3142(b) or (c) of this title, except that in the circumstance described in subparagraph (B)(iv) of this paragraph, the judicial officer shall order the detention terminated at the expiration of the likely reduced sentence.(2) The judicial officer shall order that a person who has been found guilty of an offense in a case described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of subsection (f)(1) of section 3142 and sentenced to a term of imprisonment, and who has filed an appeal or a petition for a writ of certiorari, be detained.(c)Release or Detention Pending Appeal by the Government.—The judicial officer shall treat a defendant in a case in which an appeal has been taken by the United States under section 3731 of this title, in accordance with section 3142 of this title, unless the defendant is otherwise subject to a release or detention order. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the judicial officer, in a case in which an appeal has been taken by the United States under section 3742, shall—(1) if the person has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment, order that person detained; and(2) in any other circumstance, release or detain the person under section 3142.(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 203(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1981; amended Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 223(f), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2028; Pub. L. 99–646, §§ 51(a), (b), 55(a), (d), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3605–3607, 3609; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7091, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4410; Pub. L. 101–647, title IX, § 902(a), (b), title X, § 1001(a), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4826, 4827; Pub. L. 102–572, title VII, § 703, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4515.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 3143, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 821; June 22, 1966, Pub. L. 89–465, § 5(d), 80 Stat. 217, related to additional bail, prior to repeal in the revision of this chapter by section 203(a) of Pub. L. 98–473.

Amendments

1992—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 102–572 substituted “subparagraph (B)(iv) of this paragraph” for “paragraph (b)(2)(D)”.

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–647, § 902(a), designated existing provisions as par. (1), substituted “Except as provided in paragraph (2), the judicial officer” for “The judicial officer”, and added par. (2).

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 101–647, § 1001(a), substituted “awaiting” for “waiting”.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–647, § 902(b), designated existing provisions as par. (1), substituted “Except as provided in paragraph (2), the judicial officer” for “The judicial officer”, redesignated former pars. (1) and (2) as subpars. (A) and (B), redesignated former subpars. (A) to (D) as cls. (i) to (iv), respectively, of subpar. (B), and added par. (2).

1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–690, § 7091(2), inserted “, except that in the circumstance described in paragraph (b)(2)(D), the judicial officer shall order the detention terminated at the expiration of the likely reduced sentence” before period at end.

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 100–690, § 7091(1), added par. (2) and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: “that the appeal is not for purpose of delay and raises a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in reversal, an order for a new trial, or a sentence that does not include a term of imprisonment.”

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–646, § 55(d)(1), (2), (4), substituted “under” for “pursuant to” and “such judicial officer” for “he” and struck out “the provisions of” after “in accordance with”.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–646, § 55(d)(1)–(4), in par. (1) substituted “under” for “pursuant to” and inserted “of this title” after “(c)”, and in concluding provision, substituted “such judicial officer” for “he”, struck out “the provisions of” after “in accordance with”, and inserted “of this title” after “(c)”.

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 99–646, § 51(a)(1), substituted “reversal,” for “reversal or” and inserted “, or a sentence that does not include a term of imprisonment”.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–646, § 51(a)(2), inserted provision that, except as provided in subsec. (b), the judicial officer, in a case in which an appeal has been taken by the United States under section 3742, if the person has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment, order that person detained, and in any other circumstance, release or detain the person under section 3142.

Pub. L. 99–646, § 55(a), (d)(2), (5), substituted “under section 3731” for “pursuant to the provisions of section 3731” and “with section 3142 of this title” for “with the provisions of section 3142”.

Pub. L. 99–646, § 51(b), provided that the amendment of subsec. (c) by section 223(f)(2) of Pub. L. 98–473 shall not take effect. See 1984 Amendment note below.

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–473, § 223(f)(1), inserted provisions relating to applicable guideline under section 994 of title 28.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–473, § 223(f)(2), which would have added a final sentence requiring a judge to treat a defendant in a case in which an appeal had been taken by the United States pursuant to the provisions of section 3742 in accordance with the provisions of (1) subsection (a) if the person had been sentenced to a term of imprisonment; or (2) section 3142 if the person had not been sentenced to a term of imprisonment did not become effective pursuant to section 51(b) of Pub. L. 99–646. See 1986 Amendment note above.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Jan. 1, 1993, see section 1101 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 905 of Title 2, The Congress.

Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–646, § 51(c), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3606, provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a)(2) [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the taking of effect of section 3742 of title 18, United States Code [Nov. 1, 1987].”

Amendment by section 55(a), (d) of Pub. L. 99–646 effective 30 days after Nov. 10, 1986, see section 55(j) of Pub. L. 99–646, set out as a note under section 3141 of this title.

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–473 effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such amendment, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 802 cases (105 in the last 5 years), 1952–2026 · leading case: United States v. Mohammed Abuhamra
United States v. Mohammed Abuhamra (2004) ca2 · cites it 7× “Arcara, Judge) on criminal charges of money laundering and dealing in contraband cigarettes, appeals from an April 22, 2004 order of that court denying his application for release on bail pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (a). The appeal presents a single question: whether a district…”
United States v. Sharon Pollard (1985) ca6 · cites it 9× “Upon the prosecution’s motion and under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3143 , the District Court denied bail pending appeal concluding that defendant’s appeal did not raise a substantial question of law.”
Demore v. Kim (2003) scotus · cites it 2× “18 U.S.C. § 3143 (b). These standards give considerable weight to any special governmental interest in detention ( e.”
United States v. Libby (2007) dcd · cites it 8× “1 Upon the imposition of the sentence, the defendant requested that he be released on bond pending his appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143 because one or more of the issues he plans to raise on appeal constitute “substantial question[s] of law or fact likely to result in [a…”
United States v. Stacey C. Koon, United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell (1993) ca9 · cites it 10× “18 U.S.C. §§ 3143 (b)(2) and 3145(c). These two officers were convicted of a violent act, and neither has shown “exceptional reasons” why he should be treated differently from everyone else who has committed a crime of violence.”
United States v. Grant C. Affleck, United States of America v. Frank Kowalik, Jr. (1985) ca10 · cites it 6× “On November 21, the Government filed a motion in the district court to reconsider its order staying execution of Affleck’s sentence and ordering his release pending appeal, or in the alternative, to hold an expedited hearing and to make the findings to support such an order as…”
United States v. Salerno (1987) scotus · cites it 2× “" 18 U. S. C. § 3143 (b)(1) (1982 ed., Supp.”
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jack Chilingirian, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee (2002) ca6 · cites it 4× “The Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (b), creates a presumption against release pending appeal.”
In Re Sealed Case (2003) mied · cites it 9× “The Court will deny release on bond because (1) Defendant’s detention in this situation is mandatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (a)(2), and (2) the Court lacks jurisdiction to determine whether any exceptional reasons, under 18 U.”
United States v. Jose Ramon Garcia, United States of America v. Edward Michael Powers (2003) ca9 · cites it 5× “18 U.S.C. § 3143 (b)(1). Under the Mandatory Detention Act of 1990, however, violent offenders, as well as those convicted of drug offenses with a maximum sentence of at least ten years in prison and those convicted of any offense with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment or…”
United States v. Joseph Disomma (1991) ca2 · cites it 5× “Thus, either actual or threatened violence would have occurred during the course of the theft, and the statutory element of the crime would be satisfied.”
United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregor (1988) cadc · cites it 5× “*555 PER CURIAM: Appellants, Perholtz, Jackson and Fletcher, moved for release pending appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (b) (Supp. Ill 1985) and Fed.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b)(1)(B)(i) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b)(1)(B)(iv) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b)(2) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.