Joseph C. Anders v. Margaret C. Hambrick Barbara Holderfield Ron Moore Barry Colley United States Bureau of Prisons, 956 F.2d 268 (6th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Joseph C. Anders v. Margaret C. Hambrick Barbara Holderfield Ron Moore Barry Colley United States Bureau of Prisons, 956 F.2d 268 (6th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“in failing to provide the court with accurate and trustworthy evidence establishing the amount the setoff, the defendants failed to carry their burden.”
34 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Atlas Oil Company v. Extreme Petroleum Services Company (mied, 2022-05-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Atlas Oil Company v. Extreme Petroleum Services Company
E.D. Mich. · 2022 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
in failing to provide the court with accurate and trustworthy evidence establishing the amount the setoff, the defendants failed to carry their burden.
discussed Cited "see" Collins v. Commissioner of Social Security
S.D. Ohio · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crouch v. Hinton, 956 F.2d 268 (6th Cir. 1992) (a “report and recommendation entered by a magistrate judge is not final and appealable unless the magistrate judge has been given plenary jurisdiction by the district court and by the consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c)(1).).
cited Cited "see" Kendall Holdings, Ltd. v. Eden Cryogenics LLC
S.D. Ohio · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See BancTraining Video Systems v. First American Corp., 956 F.2d 268 (Table), 1992 WL 42345, *3 (6th Cir.1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph C. Anders
v.
Margaret C. Hambrick Barbara Holderfield Ron Moore Barry Colley United States Bureau of Prisons
91-6125.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 26, 1992.
956 F.2d 268
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 79%
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)

956 F.2d 268

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Joseph C. ANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Margaret C. HAMBRICK; Barbara Holderfield; Ron Moore;
Barry Colley; United States Bureau of Prisons,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6125.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 26, 1992.

1

Before RYAN and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges, and CHURCHILL, Senior District Judge.[*]

ORDER

2

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

3

Joseph Anders requests appointment of counsel and appeals the district court's order dismissing his Bivens -type action for failure to state a cause of action. Anders claimed that the defendants violated his equal protection and due process rights by untimely filing his paperwork pursuant to Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act. The defendants are a case manager at the Federal Prison Camp in Petersburg, Virginia, and various officials at the Federal Correctional Institution at Ashland, Kentucky. They are sued in both their official and individual capacities. He requested damages and injunctive relief.

4

After reviewing the magistrate judge's Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation, the district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. See Yellen v. Cooper, 828 F.2d 1471, 1474 (10th Cir.1987).

5

Anders raises the same arguments on appeal.

6

Upon consideration, we conclude that the district court was correct in dismissing the case. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the June 26, 1991, Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation, which was adopted by the district court in its July 29, 1991, order, the district court's order is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. The motion for counsel is denied.

*

The Honorable James P. Churchill, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation