Thomas James Ponchik Julian Roger Sanchez v. Earl King Automatic Vendors, Inc., United States of Am., Intervenor-Appellee, 957 F.2d 608 (8th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Thomas James Ponchik Julian Roger Sanchez v. Earl King Automatic Vendors, Inc., United States of Am., Intervenor-Appellee, 957 F.2d 608 (8th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cherokee Nation Businesses LLC v. Arkansas, State of (ared, 2025-08-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Cherokee Nation Businesses LLC v. Arkansas, State of
E.D. Ark. · 2025 · confidence medium
Ponchik v. King, 957 F.2d 608, 609 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Little v. Kirkstall Road Enterprises, Inc.
E.D. Mo. · 2020 · confidence medium
N.A., 787 F.3d 937, 939 (8th Cir. 2015) (finding plaintiff lacked standing to invalidate foreclosure based on violation of a trust agreement to which plaintiff was not a party); Ponchik v. King, 957 F.2d 608, 609 (8th Cir. 1992) (finding plaintiffs lacked standing to sue where they were not parties to the contract or third-party beneficiaries); Anderson v. Aramark Mgmt.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Company v. Hincapie
W.D. Mo. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Mo. Apr. 24, 2017) (finding plaintiffs lacked standing to seek a declaration of rights under an agreement where they failed to present evidence that they were parties to or third-party beneficiaries of the agreement); see also Ponchik v. King, 957 F.2d 608, 609 (8th Cir. 1992) (finding plaintiffs lacked standing to sue where they were not parties to the contract or third-party beneficiaries); Farmers Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas James PONCHIK; Julian Roger Sanchez, Appellants,
v.
Earl KING; Automatic Vendors, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee
91-3010.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Feb 26, 1992.
957 F.2d 608
Thomas James Ponchik, pro se., Jerome G. Arnold and Lonnie F. Bryan, Minneapolis, Minn., for U.S., Carol M. Person and Thomas A. Clure, Duluth, Minn., for Earl King and Automatic Vendors, Inc.
McMillian, Wollman, Loken.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Thomas James Ponchik and Julian Roger Sanchez, federal inmates, appeal from the district court’s [1] judgment for defendants in this civil contract action.

Ponchik and Sanchez filed suit in state court against Automatic Vendors, Inc. (AVI) and its president, Earl King, seeking to void AVI’s contract with the Bureau of Prisons to provide vending machine services at the Federal Correctional Institution in Sandstone, Minnesota. They also sought injunctive relief and damages. After careful review of the record, we agree with the district court that plaintiffs lacked standing to bring this suit. Plaintiffs were not parties to the contract or third-party beneficiaries.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.