Acree Oil Co. v. Dep't of Transp., 474 S.E.2d 770 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Acree Oil Co. v. Dep't of Transp., 474 S.E.2d 770 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ACREE OIL COMPANY
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
A94A2052.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Aug 8, 1996.
474 S.E.2d 770
Adams, Clifton & Sanders, Alton M. Adams, Stewart, Melvin & Frost, Frank Armstrong III, for appellant., Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, George P. Shingler, Deputy Attorney General, Hulsey, Oliver & Mahar, Thomas L. Fitzgerald, R. David Syfan, for appellee.
Birdsong.
Published
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

In Dept. of Transp. v. Acree Oil Co., 266 Ga. 336 (467 SE2d 319), the Supreme Court reversed our ruling in Acree Oil Co. v. Dept. of Transp., 216 Ga. App. 586 (455 SE2d 590) as to the admissibility of certain evidence of business losses in this particular condemnation case. The Supreme Court having held that the trial court “did not abuse its discretion by excluding Aeree Oil’s speculative evidence of its business losses,” Dept. of Transp., 266 Ga. at 337 (2), we hereby vacate our ruling on that point and we affirm the judgment below, there being no other discernible enumerations of error requiring reconsideration.

Judgment affirmed.

Blackburn and Ruffin, JJ, concur.