green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gaffney v. Addison
Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the determination that he engaged in insubordination is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Longton v Village of Corinth, 57 AD3d 1273, 1274 [2008], lv denied 13 NY3d 709 [2009]; Matter of Scazafavo v Erie County Water Auth., 30 AD3d 1034, 1035 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 714 [2006]), i.e., by “such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact” (300 Gramatan Ave.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gaffney v. Addison
Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the determination that he engaged in insubordination is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Longton v Village of Corinth, 57 AD3d 1273, 1274 [2008], lv denied 13 NY3d 709 [2009]; Matter of Scazafavo v Erie County Water Auth., 30 AD3d 1034, 1035 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 714 [2006]), i.e., by “such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact” (300 Gramatan Ave.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ronald Lynch
v.
State of New York
v.
State of New York
Claim No. 110584.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jun 9, 2006.
Published
Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Michael E. Hudson, J), entered September 12, 2005. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied in part claimant’s motion seeking document discovery and interrogatory responses.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, J.P, Gorski, Martoche, Green and Hayes, JJ.