Goohya v. Walsh-Tozer, 33 A.D.3d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006). · Go Syfert
Goohya v. Walsh-Tozer, 33 A.D.3d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Matter of Murphy v. Baldwin Union Free Sch. Dist. (nyappdiv, 2015-06-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matter of Murphy v. Baldwin Union Free Sch. Dist.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222 , 230 [1974]; Matter of Capone v Patchogue-Medford Union Free School Dist., 38 AD3d 770, 772 [2007]; Matter of Sahni v New York City Bd. of Educ., 240 AD2d 751, 751 [1997]; see also Matter of Goohya v Walsh-Tozer, 33 AD3d 798 [2006]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Indrakumar Goohya
v.
Mary Ann Walsh-Tozer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 17, 2006.
33 A.D.3d 798
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Proceeding[*799] Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, Mary Ann Walsh-Tozer, as Commissioner of the Rockland County Department of Mental Health, dated June 3, 2004, which rejected the recommendation of a Hearing Officer, made after a hearing, found that the petitioner was guilty of patient abuse, professional misconduct, and sexual harassment, and terminated the petitioner from his employment with the Rockland County Department of Mental Health.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 [1978]; Matter of Maher v Cade, 15 AD3d 489 [2005]). Further, the penalty of dismissal is not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222 [1974]; Matter of Maher v Cade, supra).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either not properly before the Court or without merit. Miller, J.E, Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ, concur.