green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Charette v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
See, e.g., Carlson v. Secretary of Dep’t. of Health & Human Servs., 23 Cl.Ct. 788, 790 (1991), aff'd, 968 F.2d 1227 (Fed.Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lisa Munn, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chelsea Vukelich v. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
(2×)
I 1989) 2 See, e.g., Hines v. Secretary of the Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 940 F.2d 1518 (Fed.Cir.1991), and Grant v. Secretary of the Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 956 F.2d 1144 (Fed.Cir.1992); compare Johnson v. Secretary of the Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 968 F.2d 1227 (1992) (nonprecedential) 3 This combination of vaccines is sometimes listed with tetanus second, as here, and sometimes third, in which case the abbreviation is DPT.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Larry A. Eaton
v.
Department of the Army
v.
Department of the Army
91-3444.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
May 11, 1992.
Unpublished
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Larry A. EATON, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent.
No. 91-3444.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 11, 1992.
Before MAYER, MICHEL and PLAGER, Circuit Judges.
Judgment
PER CURIAM:
1
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.