1422 Corp. v. Rosenfeld, 44 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
1422 Corp. v. Rosenfeld, 44 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Spencer v. City of Buffalo
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · confidence medium
The criminal prosecution concerns other incidents that did [*2]not involve plaintiff ( see Galper v Burkes , 44 AD3d 451, 452 [1st Dept 2007]; cf. Britt v International Bus Servs. , 255 AD2d 143, 144 [1st Dept 1998]; DeSiervi v Liverzani , 136 AD2d 527, 528 [2d Dept 1988]) and, even if certain questions at the deposition might relate to the criminal prosecution, Krug "may . . . assert the privilege [only] when he reasonably perceives a risk from answering a particular question posed during the deposition" ( Lloyd , 23 AD3d at 784 ; see Astor , 62 AD3d at 869 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
1422 Corp.
v.
Steven Rosenfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 16, 2007.
44 A.D.3d 451
Published

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered April 12, 2007, which, in an action seeking, inter alia, a declaration that a lease is null and void, denied plaintiff landlord’s motion to remove and consolidate a holdover proceeding it brought against defendant in Civil Court, and, sua sponte, stayed the action pending determination of the holdover proceeding, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly denied the motion to consolidate and properly stayed the action pending resolution of the holdover proceeding, where the holdover proceeding seeks much of the same relief sought herein, namely, defendant’s eviction and money damages representing, in large part, the fair rental value of the premises (CPLR 2201). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Marlow, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.