People v. Reyes, 58 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Reyes, 58 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Global Horizon Funding LLC v. Prestige Trucking Global LLC
N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. · 2024 · confidence medium
(NYSCEF No. 39 at 3.) The rule applies in either of two scenarios: When "the testimony of plaintiff's attorney will be necessary to establish the claim or prejudicial in the event the attorney is called" by the opposing party. ( East Forty-Fourth Street LLC v Bildirici , 58 AD3d 542, 542 [1st Dept 2009] [emphasis added].) A party seeking disqualification is not "required to show that [an advocate-witness's] continued representation would prejudice his clients; such a showing is required only when the attorney is called as a witness for the adverse party." ( Sokolow, Dunaud, Mercadier & Carrera…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Melvin Reyes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 22, 2009.
58 A.D.3d 542
Published

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered on or about October 26, 2007, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Tom, J.E, Andrias, Nardelli, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.