United States v. Oscar J. Perez, 975 F.2d 677 (10th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
United States v. Oscar J. Perez, 975 F.2d 677 (10th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
84 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Summerhaze Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (utah, 2014-07-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Summerhaze Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Utah · 2014 · confidence medium
Co., 975 F.2d 677, 681 (10th Cir.1992). 10 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Essex Insurance Co. v. Integrated Drainage Solutions, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, Pa., 975 F.2d 677, 683 (10th Cir.1992)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Davis v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.
Okla. Civ. App. · 2012 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, PA, 975 F.2d 677, 688 (10th Cir.1992); 3 Powell v. Ameri can Cas.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Chalfonte Condominium Apartment Association, Inc. v. QBE Insurance Corporation
11th Cir. · 2012 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, Pa., 975 F.2d 677, 683 (10th Cir.1992); see also Essex Ins.
cited Cited as authority (rule) QBE Insurance Corp. v. Chalfonte Condominium Apartment Ass'n
Fla. · 2012 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, Pa., 975 F.2d 677, 683 (10th Cir.1992); see also Essex Ins.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Thomas v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Colo. · 2011 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, Pa., 975 F.2d 677, 681 (10th Cir.1992)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Essex Insurance v. Zota
S.D. Fla. · 2009 · confidence medium
Pa., 975 F.2d 677, 683 (10th Cir.1992) (“[vjoidance of exclusion to an insurance policy is a severe penalty which alters the very terms of the deal between the parties.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Combs v. Shelter Mutual Insurance
10th Cir. · 2008 · confidence medium
We will “not permit ambiguities *998 to be created by taking contract provisions out of context.” FDIC. v. American Casualty Co., 975 F.2d 677, 680 (10th Cir.1992).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Maska U.S., Inc. v. Kansa General Insurance
2d Cir. · 1999 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, PA, 975 F.2d 677, 682-83 (10th Cir.1992) (applying Oklahoma law); Great Lakes Container Corp. v. National Union Fire Ins.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Maska U.S., Inc. v. Kansa General Insurance Company
2d Cir. · 1999 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, PA, 975 F.2d 677, 682-83 (10th Cir. 1992) (applying Oklahoma law); Great Lakes Container Corp. v. National Union Fire Ins.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Vigil v. Rio Grande Insurance
N.M. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
Co., 975 F.2d 677, 682-83 (10th Cir.1992) (voiding of unapproved exclusion is unduly severe remedy).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vigil v. Rio Grande Ins. of Santa Fe
N.M. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
App.1982) (court will not enforce unapproved rider that directly contradicts term in approved policy) with FDIC v. American Cas. *302 Co., 975 F.2d 677, 682-83 (10th Cir.1992) (voiding of unapproved exclusion is unduly severe remedy).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cage v. Litchfield Mutual Insurance
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1997 · confidence medium
Corp. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., 975 F.2d 677, 683 (10th Cir. 1992), the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that “we do not believe that the Oklahoma legislature intended that otherwise lawful exclusions be voided simply for failure to comply with [ Okla.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hedden
N.D. Miss. · 1995 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, Pa., 975 F.2d 677, 682, 683 (10th Cir.1992) (holding failure to gain approval of Insurance Board for endorsement did not void regulatory exclusion); see also Gary v. American Cas.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Stanton v. RICH BAKER BERMAN & CO., PA
D.N.J. · 1995 · confidence medium
In the absence of a clear violation of public policy under New York law, invalidating any portion of the Agreements is inappropriate. 18 F.D.I.C. v. American Casualty Co., 998 F.2d 404 , 409 (7th Cir.1993) (“The power to deny enforcement of contract terms on public policy grounds is restricted to those situations in which the contract would violate ‘some explicit public policy, that is well-defined and dominant, and is to be ascertained by reference to the laws and legal precedents and not *1387 from general considerations of supposed public interest.’ ” (quoting United Paperworkers In…
cited Cited as authority (rule) American Casualty Company Of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
1st Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
Co. v. FDIC, 968 F.2d 695, 702-03 (8th Cir.1992); FDIC v. American Casualty Co., 975 F.2d 677, 682 (10th Cir.1992).
cited Cited as authority (rule) American Casualty Co. of Reading v. Federal Deposit Insurance
6th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
Co. v. FDIC, 968 F.2d 695, 702-03 (8th Cir.1992); FDIC v. American Casualty Co., 975 F.2d 677, 682 (10th Cir.1992).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) American Casualty Co. v. Sentry Federal Savings Bank (2×)
D. Mass. · 1994 · confidence medium
Co., 975 F.2d 677, 680-83 (10th Cir.1992); American Cas.
cited Cited as authority (rule) American Casualty Co. v. Rahn
W.D. Mich. · 1994 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, PA 975 F.2d 677, 680 (4th Cir.1992) (citing similar holdings in several other cases).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, and Continental Casualty Company Cna Financial Corporation Cna Insurance Companies, Counterclaim-Defendants-Appellants v. Joe G. Baker Verne F. Potter William E. Leonard James C. Roberts Frank Purcell, Jr. Joe Sax H. Cedric Roberts Ernest W. Baker Harold Harris John E. Egdahl Walter L. Huckabay Joe D. McCarthy Franklin D. Hatridge James D. Stroffe Bruce Kehrli Peter T. Fletcher Bernard Baker, Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Joe G. Baker Ernest W. Baker, and Peter T. Fletcher, Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Joe G. Baker Verne F. Potter William E. Leonard James C. Roberts Frank Purcell, Jr. Joe Sax H. Cedric Roberts Ernest W. Baker Harold Harris John E. Egdahl Walter L. Huckabay Joe D. McCarthy James D. Stroffe Bruce Kehrli Peter T. Fletcher Bernard Baker, and Franklin D. Hatridge Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. Continental Casualty Company Cna Financial Corp. Cna Insurance Co., Counter-Defendants-Appellees, and Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Joe G. Baker Verne F. Potter William E. Leonard James C. Roberts Frank Purcell, Jr. Joe Sax H. Cedric Roberts Ernest W. Baker Harold Harris John E. Egdahl Walter L. Huckabay Joe D. McCarthy Franklin D. Hatridge James D. Stroffe Bruce Kehrli Peter T. Fletcher, Bernard Baker, Continental Casualty Company Cna Financial Corp. Cna Insurance Co., Counter-Defendants, Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Joe G. Baker Verne F. Potter John E. Egdahl Walter L. Huckabay Joe D. McCarthy Franklin D. Hatridge James D. Stroffe Bruce Kehrli Peter T. Fletcher Bernard Baker, William E. Leonard James C. Roberts Frank Purcell, Jr. Joe Sax H. Cedric Roberts Ernest W. Baker Harold Harris, Jr., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants, Continental Casualty Company Cna Financial Corp. Cna Insurance Co., Counter-Defendants, Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Joe G. Baker Verne F. Potter William E. Leonard James C. Roberts Frank Purcell, Jr. Joe Sax H. Cedric Roberts Ernest W. Baker Harold Harris John E. Egdahl Walter L. Huckabay Joe D. McCarthy Franklin D. Hatridge James D. Stroffe Bruce Kehrli Peter T. Fletcher Bernard Baker, Continental Casualty Company Cna Financial Corp. Cna Insurance Co., Counter-Defendants-Appellees, Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Joe G. Baker Verne F. Potter William E. Leonard James C. Roberts Frank Purcell, Jr. Joe Sax H. Cedric Roberts Ernest W. Baker Harold Harris Franklin D. Hatridge James D. Stroffe Bruce Kehrli Peter T. Fletcher Bernard Baker, John E. Egdahl Walter L. Huckabay Joe D. McCarthy Continental Casualty Company Cna Financial Corp. Cna Insurance Co., Counter-Defendants-Appellees, Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Joe G. Baker Verne F. Potter, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants, William E. Leonard James C. Roberts Frank Purcell, Jr. Joe Sax H. Cedric Roberts Ernest W. Baker Harold Harris John E. Egdahl Walter L. Huckabay Joe D. McCarthy Franklin D. Hatridge James D. Stroffe Bruce Kehrli Peter T. Fletcher Bernard Baker, Continental Casualty Company Cna Financial Corp. Cna Insurance Co., Counter-Defendants, Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Joe G. Baker Verne F. Potter William E. Leonard James C. Roberts Frank Purcell, Jr. Joe Sax H. Cedric Roberts Ernest W. Baker Harold Harris John E. Egdahl Walter L. Huckabay Joe D. McCarthy Franklin D. Hatridge James D. Stroffe Bruce Kehrli Peter T. Fletcher Bernard Baker, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, Continental Casualty Company Cna Financial Corp. Cna Insurance Co., Counter-Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Joe G. Baker Verne F. Potter William E. Leonard James C. Roberts Frank Purcell, Jr. Joe Sax H. Cedric Roberts Ernest W. Baker Harold Harris John E. Egdahl Walter L. Huckabay Joe D. McCarthy Franklin D. Hatridge Peter T. Fletcher Bernard Baker, Bruce A. Kehrli James D. Stroffe, Continental Casualty Company Cna Financial Corp. Cna Insurance Co., Counter-Defendants, Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor
9th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
On appeal, the RTC contends only that the exclusion is inapplicable because the RTC is not a "regulatory agency." We reject this strained argument. 71 The Regulatory Exclusion provides that CNA will not be liable for claims against the Directors/Officers based upon or attributable to: 72 [A]ny action or proceeding brought by or on behalf of the [FDIC], the Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation, any other depository insurance organization, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, or any other national or state regulatory agency ... including any type of legal ac…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) American Casualty Co. v. Baker
9th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
Because every circuit that has considered the exclusion has found it valid and not violative of public policy, see FDIC v. American Casualty Co., 998 F.2d 404, 407-10 (7th Cir.1993) (Cuba); FDIC v. American Casualty Co., 996 F.2d 471, 472-74 (4th Cir.1993) (Fidelity); FDIC v. American Casualty Co., 975 F.2d 677, 680-83 (10th Cir.1992) (Security); FDIC v. Conner, 973 F.2d 1236 , 1239-44 (5th Cir.1992); St.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) American Casualty Co. v. Resolution Trust Corp.
D.N.J. · 1993 · confidence medium
Co. v. FDIC, 968 F.2d 695, 701 (8th Cir.1992) citing American Casualty Co. v. FDIC, 944 F.2d 455 , 460 (8th Cir.1991) (“when read as a whole, the regulatory exclusion covers any claim, direct or secondary, brought against the directors and officers of the bank by the FDIC in any capacity”); FDIC v. American Casualty Co., 975 F.2d 677, 690 (10th Cir. 1992) (awkward “based upon or attributable language” simply acts as a link between general excluding language and the specific types of claims excluded); FSLIC v. Shelton, 789 F.Supp. 1367 (M.D.La.1992) (holding that phrase “based upon or…
cited Cited as authority (rule) American Casualty Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
W.D. Okla. · 1993 · confidence medium
Co., 975 F.2d 677, 679-80 (10th Cir.1992).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. American Casualty Company Of Reading, Pennsylvania, Inc.
4th Cir. · 1993 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, PA., 975 F.2d 677, 680 (10th Cir.1992). 13 Nor does enforcement of the regulatory exclusion violate federal law or public policy.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pennsylvania
4th Cir. · 1993 · confidence medium
Co. of Reading, PA, 975 F.2d 677, 680 (10th Cir.1992).
discussed Cited "see" John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.
D. Mass. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa., 975 F.2d 677, 683 (10th Cir.1992) (failure to provide for voiding of policy in statute and providing for such voiding elsewhere indicated legislative intent to preclude voiding of insurance provision).
cited Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PA.
7th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Casualty Co., 975 F.2d at 682 (examining the legislative history of § 1821).
discussed Cited "see" Fidelity & Deposit Company Of Maryland v. Thomas R. Conner
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See FDIC v. American Casualty Co., 975 F.2d 677, 682 (10th Cir.1992) (rejecting FDIC's assertion that exclusionary clause in director and officer liability policy was void as contrary to public policy, court stated that "Congress intended to remain neutral on the question in FIRREA."); St.
discussed Cited "see" Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Conner
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See FDIC v. American Casualty Co., 975 F.2d 677, 682 (10th Cir.1992) (rejecting FDIC’s assertion that exclusionary clause in director and officer liability policy was void as contrary to public policy, court stated that “Congress intended to remain neutral on the question in FIRREA.”); St.
cited Cited "see, e.g." American Casualty Co. v. Continisio
D.N.J. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., FDIC v. American Casualty Co., 975 F.2d 677 (10th Cir.1992); Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Conner, 973 F.2d 1236 (5th Cir.1992); St.
examined Cited "see, e.g." Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading (3×)
Colo. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Co., 800 P.2d 58, 60 (Colo.1990); see also FDIC v. American Casualty Co., 975 F.2d 677, 682 (10th Cir.1992) (finding that state statutes could articulate a public policy voiding regulatory exclusions).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Oscar J. PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
90-4149.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Aug 24, 1992.
975 F.2d 677
McKay, Logan, Seymour, Moore, Anderson, Tacha, Baldock, Brorby, Ebel, Kelly, Sparr.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

ORDER

Upon consideration of the government’s petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc and the appellant’s response:

The petition for rehearing is denied by the panel that rendered the decision sought to be reheard.

In accordance with Fed.R.App.P. 35(b), the clerk transmitted the suggestion for rehearing en banc to members of the panel and to all other judges of the court in regular active service. A vote was taken and pursuant thereto the court grants rehearing en banc of those issues raised in the government’s petition.

Oral argument on rehearing en banc is set for Tuesday, September 29, at 2:30 p.m. in the United States Courthouse, Denver, Colorado.