In Re Sylvester Jones, 976 F.2d 1444 (D.C. Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Sylvester Jones, 976 F.2d 1444 (D.C. Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · "Finard II"
15 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brannock Associates, Inc. v. Capitol 801 Corp. (dcd, 1992-11-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Brannock Associates, Inc. v. Capitol 801 Corp. (2×)
D.D.C. · 1992 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
finard ii
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bingham v. Goldberg. Marchesano. Kohlman. Inc.
D.C. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
On the contrary, "quantum meruit [ ] is not applicable when compensation of the parties is covered by an express written contract.” Standley v. Egbert, 267 A.2d 365, 368 (D.C.1970); see also Finard & Co. v. Capitol 801 Corp., 749 F.Supp. 15, 18 (D.D.C.1990), aff 'd in part, 298 U.S.App.D.C. 140 , 976 F.2d 1444 (1992); Chancellor v. L.J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Sylvester Jones
92-8009.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Sep 17, 1992.
976 F.2d 1444
Unpublished
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: District of Columbia (2)

976 F.2d 1444

298 U.S.App.D.C. 140

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
In re Sylvester JONES, Petitioner.

No. 92-8009.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Sept. 17, 1992.

Before WILLIAMS, SENTELLE and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of petition for writ of mandamus, and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, it is

2

ORDERED that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis be granted. It is

3

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus be denied. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that his right to the relief sought is clear and indisputable. See Kerr v. United States District Court, 426 U.S. 394, 403 (1976); In re Thornburgh, 869 F.2d 1503, 1507 (D.C.Cir.1989). Complaints substantially similar to the ones in question have in fact been processed by the court. Although petitioner claims that both complaints relate to orders issued in 1992, one actually related to an order issued in 1991 and, as such, is substantially similar to judicial complaint No. 92-4. The other complaint is substantially similar to judicial complaint No. 92-6.

4

The Clerk is directed to enter the petition for writ of mandamus on the court's general docket.