Winston v. Henrico Cnty. Bd. of Sup'rs, 978 F.2d 1257 (4th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Winston v. Henrico Cnty. Bd. of Sup'rs, 978 F.2d 1257 (4th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Island Creek Kentucky Mining Co. v. William Belt (ca6, 2020-11-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Island Creek Kentucky Mining Co. v. William Belt
6th Cir. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
That’s why an ALJ must take notice of the DOT when using it “to determine the exertional requirements of the miner’s usual coal mine employment,” for example when “there is no alternative method for establishing” the requirements because “the miner is deceased.” Onderko, 14 Black Lung Rep. 1- 2; see Westmoreland Coal Co., Inc. v. Powers, 978 F.2d 1257 , 1992 WL 312193 , at *3 n.1 (4th (“[T]he administrative law judge specifically advised the parties that they had ‘25 days from the date of the issuance of this Decision to contest taking notice’ of the DOT.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clarence E. Winston
v.
Henrico County Board of Supervisors Donald L. Boswell, Sheriff of Henrico County Roland T. Baehr, Chief Deputy of Henrico County Merle H. Bruce, Jr., Chief Jailor of Henrico County
92-6628.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 23, 1992.
978 F.2d 1257
Unpublished

978 F.2d 1257

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Clarence E. WINSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HENRICO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; Donald L. Boswell,
Sheriff of Henrico County; Roland T. Baehr, Chief Deputy of
Henrico County; Merle H. Bruce, Jr., Chief Jailor of Henrico
County, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6628.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 28, 1992
Decided: October 23, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Clarence E. Winston, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Clarence E. Winston appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Winston v. Henrico County Board of Supervisors, CA-92-317-AM (E.D. Va. May 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED