Key Enter. of Delaware, Inc. v. Venice Hosp., Sammett Corp. & Medicare Patient Aids Ctr., Gulf Area Diversified Servs., 979 F.2d 806 (11th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Key Enter. of Delaware, Inc. v. Venice Hosp., Sammett Corp. & Medicare Patient Aids Ctr., Gulf Area Diversified Servs., 979 F.2d 806 (11th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Continental Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. v. Health Insurance Plan (nyed, 1998-02-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Continental Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. v. Health Insurance Plan
E.D.N.Y · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Key Enterprises, 979 F.2d 806 (11th Cir.1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KEY ENTERPRISES OF DELAWARE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VENICE HOSPITAL, Sammett Corporation and Medicare Patient Aids Center, Defendants-Appellees, Gulf Area Diversified Services, Et Al., Defendants
89-3086.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Nov 10, 1992.
979 F.2d 806
Christopher K. Kay, Michael J. Beaudine, Orlando, Fla., Anthony E. De Resta, Morris, Manning & Martin, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant., Herbert T. Schwartz, Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell & Wattwood, Melbourne, Fla., for Venice Hosp., Medicare Patient AIDS Center., Lynn Snyder, William G. Kopit, Washington, D.C., for Sammett Corp., Medicare Patient AIDS Center., William G. Kopit, Florida Hosp. Assoc., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellees.
Tjoflat, Fay, Kravitch, Hatchett, Anderson, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. * [*807] BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.