Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lerner v. State
Co. v State of New York, 54 AD2d 1089, 1089 [1976]), including when defendant submits the document to the federal government to demonstrate compliance with federal regulations in order to obtain funds or reimbursement (see Barnes v State of New York, 67 AD2d 1065, 1066 [1979]; Matter of Town of Oyster Bay [Bruce], 54 AD2d 762, 763 [1976]; City of Binghamton v Arlington Hotel, 30 AD2d 585, 586 [1968]; compare 815 Assoc. v State of New York, 251 AD2d 538, 539 [1998]; Schad v State of New York, 240 AD2d 483, 484 [1997]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lerner v. State
Co. v State of New York, 54 AD2d 1089, 1089 [1976]), including when defendant submits the document to the federal government to demonstrate compliance with federal regulations in order to obtain funds or reimbursement (see Barnes v State of New York, 67 AD2d 1065, 1066 [1979]; Matter of Town of Oyster Bay [Bruce], 54 AD2d 762, 763 [1976]; City of Binghamton v Arlington Hotel, 30 AD2d 585, 586 [1968]; compare 815 Assoc. v State of New York, 251 AD2d 538, 539 [1998]; Schad v State of New York, 240 AD2d 483, 484 [1997]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carolyn M. De Angelis
v.
Deane C. De Angelis
v.
Deane C. De Angelis
Appeal No. 2.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 5, 1976.
Published
Order unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in De Angelis v De Angelis (54 AD2d 1088). (Appeal from order of Ontario Supreme Court—temporary alimony.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.