Marcelino A. Villanueva petitions for review of the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (board), No. SE08319010385, January 13, 1992, affirming the initial decision of the administrative judge (AJ). The initial decision sustained the reconsideration decision of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) denying Villanueva’s application for a deferred an[*1432] nuity under the Civil Service Retirement System Act (CSRA). We affirm.

I.

The initial decision by the AJ on August 23, 1990 stated that Villanueva based his claim for annuity on service in the Department of the Army from January 8, 1945 to December 29, 1948. The board noted, however, that Villanueva actually based his claim on over six years of service: military service from June 1, 1942 to February 16, 1946; and civilian service from February 17, 1946 to December 29, 1948. Nonetheless, the board affirmed the AJ’s decision, holding that Villanueva could not count any military service toward the five-year creditable service requirement and that he, therefore, did not meet the creditable service requirement of 5 U.S.C. § 8333(a).

II.

A. To be eligible for an annuity under the current requirements of the CSRA (a) the employee must complete at least five years of civilian service; and (b) within the last two years before any separation from service the employee must complete at least one year of covered service. 5 U.S.C. § 8333 (1988). Because Villanueva did not show that he had at least five years of civilian service (he only alleged civilian service from February 17, 1946 to December 29, 1948), the board correctly determined that he did not have annuity rights under current law. He also did not show that any of his service was “covered service.”

B. The last sentence of section 8333(b) provides, however, that a failure to meet the covered service requirement will not “deprive the individual or his survivors of annuity rights which attached on a previous separation.” This provision precludes the divestment of annuity rights if the employee satisfied the eligibility requirements under the law in effect at the time of separation from employment. Esteban v. Office of Personnel Management, 978 F.2d 700, 701 (Fed.Cir.1992).

Villanueva separated from service on December 29, 1948. Villanueva’s retirement annuity rights were governed by the CSRA of 1948, which required that five years of civilian service be rendered before any employee may be entitled to an annuity. ^[1] Act of February 28, 1948, ch. 84, § 5, 62 Stat. 48, 50-51 (1948); see also S.Rep. No. 746; 80th Cong., 2d Sess. (1948), reprinted in 1948 U.S.Code Cong.Serv. 1107, 1111 (“section [5] requires that 5 years of civilian service be rendered before any employee may have title to annuity, rather than a combination of civilian and military service”). Villanueva’s contention that his military and civilian service should be combined is thus expressly precluded by the Act. Because Villanueva has alleged only 34 months of civilian service, Villanueva cannot qualify for an annuity under the[*1433] 1948 Act. See Cheeseman v. Office of Personnel Management, 791 F.2d 138, 140-41 (Fed.Cir.1986) (holding that the board properly placed the burden of proving entitlement to benefits on the applicant).

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, Villanueva is not eligible for an annuity under the current CSRA and is not eligible for an annuity under the civil service retirement law in force at the time of his separation.

AFFIRMED.