Haggerty v. Pillay, 59 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Haggerty v. Pillay, 59 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: de Fex v. Zadumin (nysupctkings, 2024-11-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) de Fex v. Zadumin
N.Y. Sup. Kings · 2024 · confidence medium
While documents may be properly admitted, the lack of an affidavit of a party with personal knowledge of the underlying facts of this case warrants denial of Plaintiff's summary judgment motion (Mastro v Mastro, 112 AD2d 203 , 203 [2d Dept 1985], citing CPLR 3212 [b]; Harding v Buchele, 59 AD2d 754, 754 [2d Dept 1977]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) 885 Park Ave. Brooklyn, LLC v. Goddard
N.Y. App. Term. · 2017 · confidence medium
Corp. v Taksen , 62 AD2d 1148, 1149 [1978]; Harding v Buchele , 59 AD2d 754, 755 [1977]; Abramoff v Federal Ins.
cited Cited as authority (rule) 885 Park Avenue Brooklyn, LLC v. Goddard
N.Y. App. Term. · 2017 · confidence medium
Corp. v Taksen, 62 AD2d 1148, 1149 [1978]; Harding v Buchele, 59 AD2d 754, 755 [1977]; Abramoff v Federal Ins.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vinar v. Litman (2×) also: Cited "see"
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
Corp. v Taksen, 62 AD2d 1148, 1149 [1978]; Harding v Buchele, 59 AD2d 754, 755 [1977]; Abramoff v Federal Ins.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vinar v. Litman (2×) also: Cited "see"
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
Corp. v Taksen, 62 AD2d 1148, 1149 [1978]; Harding v Buchele, 59 AD2d 754, 755 [1977]; Abramoff v Federal Ins.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Gershon v. Cunningham
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · confidence medium
Ruben & Co. v Fritzen, 101 AD2d 795, 795-796 [1984]; Harding v Buchele, 59 AD2d 754, 754-755 [1977]; Jackson v Timmons, 29 AD2d 664 [1968]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sharon Haggerty
v.
Subhanalli C. Pillay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 24, 1977.
59 A.D.2d 754
Published

In a negligence action to recover damages from personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 7, 1976, which denied her motion for "leave to renew” a prior order which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to serve a complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Sullivan at Special Term. Cohalan, J. P., Titone, Hawkins and Suozzi, JJ., concur.