People v. Fuller, 59 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977). · Go Syfert
People v. Fuller, 59 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. McDermott
N.Y. App. Div. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
Consequently, in the exercise of our discretion and in the interests of justice, the sentence should be reduced to a term of imprisonment of 60 days to be served in the Albany County Jail (Penal Law, § 70.00, subd 4; see People v Fuller, 59 AD2d 971 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Damato
N.Y. App. Div. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
A less restrictive deterrent being indicated (see, People v Whiting, 89 AD2d 694 ; see also, People v Fuller, 59 AD2d 971 ), in the exercise of our discretion and in the interest of justice, we modify the judgment by reducing the sentence to time already served and placing defendant on probation in accordance with the terms and conditions of the alternative sentencing program outlined in the presentence report and upon such other conditions as the sentencing court may deem appropriate.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Bruce D. Fuller
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 3, 1977.
59 A.D.2d 971
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Albany County Court, rendered September 10, 1976, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of reckless endangerment in the first degree and imposing an indeterminate sentence having a maximum of three years. On this appeal the principal contention of the defendant is that the sentence is excessive and we find no substantial merit to his remaining points. We have examined the colloquy at the time of the plea and sentencing which took place with the court, the attorney for the defendant and the defendant himself. While it appears that the charge to which he pleaded guilty concerned his wife, at the time of the sentencing the emphasis as to the seriousness of the crime concerned charges against peace officers which were not before the court. Additionally, we have examined the presentence report which was before the County Court at the time of sentencing which clearly shows defendant’s unblemished prior record and his outstanding war achievements. Under these circumstances we conclude that the sentence imposed by the County Court was harsh and unduly excessive and should be reduced to time already served and the defendant placed on probation for a period of five years in accordance with terms and conditions to be imposed by the County Court. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, by reducing the sentence to the.time already served and placing defendant on probation for a period of five years in accordance with the terms and conditions to be imposed by the trial court; matter remitted for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith, and, as so modified, affirmed. Sweeney, J. P., Mahoney, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.