green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glatzer v. Scappatura
Clearly, the two actions differed significantly because defendant Sherman & Citron was added as a party to the instant action, and, therefore, the two actions were not “between the same parties” (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 4; see, also, Mannari v Trinity 21 Corp., 73 AD2d 911 ; Brown v Lo Grasso, 203 App Div 50 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Corola A. Jernigan
v.
Claude B. Dodson, Gerald Citron, and Irwin Wanderman
v.
Claude B. Dodson, Gerald Citron, and Irwin Wanderman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 7, 1980.
Published
Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 8, 1979, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Appeal by defendant Dodson dismissed (cf. Howe Ave. Nursing Home v Nafus, 54 AD2d 686). Were we not dismissing defendant Dodson’s appeal we would have rejected his arguments. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.