United States v. Walter L. Lambert, Jr., Ronald Bruce Liffick, 983 F.2d 1070 (6th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Walter L. Lambert, Jr., Ronald Bruce Liffick, 983 F.2d 1070 (6th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Demetrius Pruitt (2×)
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Watson, 983 F.2d 1070 , 1993 WL 11873, at *2-3 (6th Cir.1993) (unpublished opinion).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Desmond S. Nelson, Michael A. Davis
6th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See 983 F.2d 1070 (6th Cir.), modified on rehearing, 996 F.2d 1218 (6th Cir.1993) (unpublished).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Walter L. Lambert, Jr., Ronald Bruce Liffick
92-3225.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Dec 15, 1992.
983 F.2d 1070
Unpublished

983 F.2d 1070

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Walter L. LAMBERT, Jr., Ronald Bruce Liffick, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 92-3225, 92-3226.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 15, 1992.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge and BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.