Kleet Lumber Co. v. J&J Foley Constr. Corp., 91 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983). · Go Syfert
Kleet Lumber Co. v. J&J Foley Constr. Corp., 91 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McDonald v. Shore (nyappdiv, 2012-11-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) McDonald v. Shore
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
Warehouses, 140 AD2d 182 [1988]; Monaghan v Meade, 91 AD2d 1014, 1015 [1983]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) McDonald v. Shore
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
Warehouses, 140 AD2d 182 [1988]; Monaghan v Meade, 91 AD2d 1014, 1015 [1983]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Alvarado-Vargas v. 6422 Holding Corp.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Under the circumstances of this case, the contentions of 6422 regarding the alleged prejudice it will suffer in pursuing its claims after the law firm’s withdrawal do not require denial of the law firm’s motion (see Charles Weiner Corp. v Davis Corp., 113 Misc 2d 263, 266 [1982]; cf. Monaghan v Meade, 91 AD2d 1014, 1015 [1983]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Seye v. Sibbio
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · confidence medium
“It is settled law in this State that a motion to withdraw as counsel is a poor vehicle to test an insurer’s right to disclaim liability or deny coverage” (Monaghan v Meade, 91 AD2d 1014, 1015 [1983]; see Brothers v Burt, 27 NY2d 905, 906 [1970]; Rusolo v Skate Odyssey, 109 AD2d 875 [1985]; cf. Dillon v Otis El.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Pryer v. DeMatteis Organizations, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 1999 · confidence medium
Warehouses, supra, at 182; Monaghan v Meade, supra, at 1015).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kleet Lumber Co., Inc.
v.
J&J Foley Construction Corp., and William Foley, Appellants-Respondents Kleet Lumber Co., Inc. v. Island Woods Building Corp., and William Foley, Appellants-Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 17, 1983.
91 A.D.2d 1014
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

— In two actions to recover for goods sold and delivered, defendants William Foley and Dennis Charette and plaintiff Kleet Lumber Co. cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (De Luca, J.), entered December 4, 1981, which denied all parties’ motions for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without Costs or disbursements. Although Special Term correctly concluded that issues of fact were present precluding summary judgment, it prematurely concluded that RPAPL 1371 is not applicable in this case. Defendants Dennis Charette and William Foley have raised, as an additional question of fact, whether the corporate second mortgage, upon which plaintiff foreclosed prior to commencing the instant action, had been given as security for the same debts upon which recovery is sought here. If this be so, the failure to have obtained a deficiency judgment pursuant to RPAPL 1371 may be raised by the defendant guarantors as a defense to the instant action (see Kings County Sav. Bank v Fulton Sav. Bank Kings County, 268 App Div 452, 454). O’Connor, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.