green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ball v. Interoceanica Corp.
See also Sweatt v. Florida Board of Pilot Commissioners, 776 F.Supp. 1538 (M.D.Fla 1991), aff'd, 985 F.2d 578 (11th Cir.1993) (boundary statute inapplicable to port on waters solely within Florida, even though access to port was through boundary waters of Florida and Georgia).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. v. Sammis
See also Sweatt v. Florida Board of Pilot Commissioners, 776 F.Supp. 1538 (M.D.Fla.1991) (boundary statute inapplicable to port located on a river wholly within Florida, even though access to port was by way of waters that form a boundary between Florida and Georgia), aff'd, 985 F.2d 578 (11th Cir.1993); The Glenearne, 7 F. 604 (D.Or.1881) (ship could use either Oregon or Washington pilot while on the Columbia River, a waterway forming the boundary between the two states, but only an Oregon pilot could navigate while on the Wallamet River, which lies solely within Oregon).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. v. Sammis
See also Sweatt v. Florida Board of Pilot Commissioners, 776 F.Supp. 1538 (M.D.Fla.1991) (boundary statute inapplicable to port located on a river wholly within Florida, even though access to port was by way of waters that form a boundary between Florida and Georgia), aff'd, 985 F.2d 578 (11th Cir.1993); The Glenearne, 7 F. 604 (D.Or.1881) (ship could use either Oregon or Washington pilot while on the Columbia River, a waterway forming the boundary between the two states, but only an Oregon pilot could navigate while on the Wallamet River, which lies solely within Oregon). 37 Nor does Warner v…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yunger
v.
Julian, Colbert, Whigham
v.
Julian, Colbert, Whigham
92-2166.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 28, 1993.
Published
Yunger
v.
Julian, Colbert, Whigham***
NO. 92-2166
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 28, 1993
1
Appeal From: M.D.Fla.
2
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3
**
Local Rule 36 case