Peters v. Scully, 986 F.2d 500 (2d Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Peters v. Scully, 986 F.2d 500 (2d Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Morales v. Miller (nyed, 1999-03-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Morales v. Miller
E.D.N.Y · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Even assuming that there was any error in this cross-examination, Morales has again failed to establish any actual prejudice resulting therefrom. 4.The Prosecutor’s Comments on Summation In Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974), the Supreme Court indicated that prosecutorial remarks on summation rise to the level of a constitutional violation only when such remarks “make [petitioner’s] trial so fundamentally unfair as to deny him due process.” Id. at 645 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 ; see also Garofolo v. Coomb, 804 F.2d 201, 206 (2d Cir.1986) (“Donnelly …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peters
v.
Scully
92-2425.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Dec 17, 1992.
986 F.2d 500
Published

986 F.2d 500

Peters
v.
Scully

NO. 92-2425

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Dec 17, 1992

1

Appeal From: E.D.N.Y.

2

AFFIRMED.