Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Ramsey H.
The statute leaves the circumstances for granting such relief to the discretion of the court (see Matter of Pratt v Schryver, 103 AD2d 1016, 1017 [1984]), and its decision whether to grant the motion will not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion (see Micallef v Miehle Co., Div. of Miehle-Goss Dexter, 39 NY2d 376, 381 [1976]; Singer v Krul, 90 AD3d 1378, 1379 [2011], lv dismissed 18 NY3d 953 [2012]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Ramsey H.
The statute leaves the circumstances for granting such relief to the discretion of the court (see Matter of Pratt v Schryver, 103 AD2d 1016, 1017 [1984]), and its decision whether to grant the motion will not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion (see Micallef v Miehle Co., Div. of Miehle-Goss Dexter, 39 NY2d 376, 381 [1976]; Singer v Krul, 90 AD3d 1378, 1379 [2011], lv dismissed 18 NY3d 953 [2012]).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Markel v. Markel
The court properly denied defendant’s pre-judgment motion to reconsider its decision (see, CPLR 4404 [b]; see also, Matter of Pratt v Schryver, 103 AD2d 1016 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albany County Department of Social Services ex rel. Sousis v. Seeberger
S., 100 AD2d 119, 128 , appeal dismissed 63 NY2d 675 [the 1981 amendment to Family Ct Act § 532 indicates either that the Legislature created an exception to the privilege against self-incrimination or, more likely, viewed the amendment as falling completely outside the scope of the prohibition against testimonial compulsion contained in section 531 and defined in Schmerber v California, 384 US 757 ]; see also, Matter of Pratt v Schryver, 103 AD2d 1016, 1017 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Elizabeth Granita
v.
Josephine Granita
v.
Josephine Granita
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jul 13, 1984.
Published
— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum decision at Supreme Court, John J. Conway, J. (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Livingston County, John J. Conway, J. — impress constructive trust.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Moule, JJ.