Doyley (Paul Philip) v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 986 F.2d 1409 (3rd Cir. 1993).

Doyley (Paul Philip) v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 986 F.2d 1409 (3rd Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment Quoted verbatim 1× 2.4 score

“use of nonconforming goods, however, does not constitute, per se, a waiver of revocation; . . . ather, a court will annul a revocation and conclude that a re-acceptance has occurred only where the buyer's actions with respect to the goods are deemed 'unreasonable.”

23 citation events across 3 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Design Plus Store Fixtures, Inc. v. Citro Corp. (ncctapp, 1998-12-15)

Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

1993 2009 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗

examined Cited as authority (quoted) Design Plus Store Fixtures, Inc. v. Citro Corp.

N.C. Ct. App. · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low

use of nonconforming goods, however, does not constitute, per se, a waiver of revocation; . . . ather, a court will annul a revocation and conclude that a re-acceptance has occurred only where the buyer's actions with respect to the goods are deemed 'unreasonable.