In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 98 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 98 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner Erik Antonio de Bulhoes Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Sep 13, 2012.
98 A.D.3d 1165
Published
Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (273 AD2d 600 [2000]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, PJ., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.