green
Positive treatment
12.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Alvarado
Thus, the sentencing promise was honored and the defendant was not entitled to an opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground he asserts (cf. People v Collier, 22 NY3d 429, 433 [2013]; People v McConnell, 49 NY2d 340, 346 [1980]; People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 241 [1974]; People v Griffin, 99 AD3d 720, 722 [2012]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Dolder
Our review of the sentencing minutes confirms that County Court did not impose any period of postrelease supervision, and the People acknowledged that such a sentence would be unauthorized (see Penal Law §§ 70.06 [2]; 70.45 [1]; People v Griffin, 99 AD3d 720, 722 [2012]; People v Mao-Sheng Lin, 84 AD3d 1595, 1595 [2011]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Dolder
Our review of the sentencing minutes confirms that County Court did not impose any period of postrelease supervision, and the People acknowledged that such a sentence would be unauthorized (see Penal Law §§ 70.06 [2]; 70.45 [1]; People v Griffin, 99 AD3d 720, 722 [2012]; People v Mao-Sheng Lin, 84 AD3d 1595, 1595 [2011]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Robert Cabeza
v.
Robert Cabeza
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 3, 2012.
Published
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.