green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Turco v. Turco
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs cross motion for an award of an attorney’s fee for defending against the defendant’s motion, which was not frivolous (see Sluyk v Sluyk, 99 AD3d 887, 888 [2012]; 22 NYCRR 130-1.1).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Turco v. Turco
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs cross motion for an award of an attorney’s fee for defending against the defendant’s motion, which was not frivolous (see Sluyk v Sluyk, 99 AD3d 887, 888 [2012]; 22 NYCRR 130-1.1).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mildred Belen Roman
v.
233 Broadway Owners, LLC, (And a Third-Party Action.)
v.
233 Broadway Owners, LLC, (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 17, 2012.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The plaintiffs contention that the Supreme Court erred in granting the defendant ADT Security Services, Inc., leave to serve and file successive motions for summary judgment is improperly raised for the first time on this appeal and, therefore, is not properly before this Court.
There is no merit to the plaintiffs remaining contention that her note of issue should be reinstated. Angiolillo, J.R, Dickerson, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.