green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Jones
Defendant’s contention that the court abused its discretion by inadequately addressing four outbursts by spectators is unpreserved for our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and in any event lacks merit (see People v Pantoliano, 127 AD2d 857, 857 [1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 715 [1987]; People v Manners, 120 AD2d 680, 680 [1986]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Jones
Defendant’s contention that the court abused its discretion by inadequately addressing four outbursts by spectators is unpreserved for our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and in any event lacks merit (see People v Pantoliano, 127 AD2d 857, 857 [1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 715 [1987]; People v Manners, 120 AD2d 680, 680 [1986]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Clayton Moultrie
v.
Clayton Moultrie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 23, 1987.
Published
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weiss-man, J.), rendered June 27, 1985, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.