Gifford, In re, 989 F.2d 504 (1st Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Gifford, In re, 989 F.2d 504 (1st Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dukhan Mumin v. Douglas D. Grieser, Donald L. Knowles, John Friend, Donald Kleine, Crystal Rhoades, Douglas County Nebraska, Lancaster County Nebraska, and State of Nebraska (ned, 2025-12-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dukhan Mumin v. Douglas D. Grieser, Donald L. Knowles, John Friend, Donald Kleine, Crystal Rhoades, Douglas County Nebraska, Lancaster County Nebraska, and State of Nebraska
D. Neb. · 2025 · confidence medium
Sturgeon v. Benton, 242 F.3d 376 (8th Cir. 2000) (citing Kahn and holding that under the domestic relations exception, the federal court lacked jurisdiction over federal civil rights claims challenging unsuccessful state court modifications to a divorce decree); Davison, 989 F.2d at 504 (holding that under the domestic relations exception, the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's § 1983 claims against the state, prosecuting attorneys, county sheriff, clerk of the court, and his ex-wife who allegedly conspired to deprive him of marital property during divorce proceedings, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re: Willis Gifford Colleen Gifford, Willis Gifford Colleen Gifford
v.
National Bank of South Dakota, Presho, Sd First Bank of South Dakota Ranchers National Bank Lyman County Recorder Brost & Brost Duane H. Thomas Leon N. Thomas
92-3671.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Mar 18, 1993.
989 F.2d 504
Unpublished

989 F.2d 504

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
IN RE: Willis GIFFORD; Colleen Gifford,
Willis Gifford; Colleen Gifford, Appellants,
v.
National Bank of South Dakota, Presho, SD; First Bank of
South Dakota; Ranchers National Bank; Lyman
County Recorder; Brost & Brost; Duane
H. Thomas; Leon N. Thomas, Appellees.

No. 92-3671.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 16, 1993.
Filed: March 18, 1993.

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Willis and Colleen Gifford, debtors, appeal from the District Court's[1] order granting the motion of First Bank of South Dakota, N.A., for administrative expenses and denying their motion for summary judgment in this bankruptcy-related action.

2

We have carefully reviewed both the District Court's order and the record, and we conclude that no error of law appears. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment for the reasons set out in the District Court's order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Donald J. Porter, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota