People v. Bradberry, 101 A.D.3d 1739 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). · Go Syfert
People v. Bradberry, 101 A.D.3d 1739 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Cedrick K. Bradberry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 28, 2012.
101 A.D.3d 1739
Published

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.31). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Sconiers, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.