green
Positive treatment
14.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Columbus Park Owners, Inc. v. McCartin
Appellate courts have long held that a motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 is properly denied for failure to provide sufficient time in the notice of motion defendants to respond. (see National Bank of Canada v Skydell, 181 AD2d 645, 646 [1st Dept 1992]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Criollo v. 719 Henry, LLC
As has been held, [Defendant]'s motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213 was properly denied for failure to provide sufficient time in the notice of motion for [Plaintiff] to respond" ( National Bank of Canada v Skydell , 181 AD2d 645, 646 [1st Dept 1992]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Criollo v. 719 Henry, LLC
As has been held, [Defendant]'s motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213 was properly denied for failure to provide sufficient time in the notice of motion for [Plaintiff] to respond" ( National Bank of Canada v Skydell , 181 AD2d 645, 646 [1st Dept 1992]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Bank of Canada
v.
Harry Skydell
v.
Harry Skydell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 31, 1992.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered February 25, 1991, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs, only with respect to defendant Skydell. That part of the appeal[*646] involving the other defendants is stayed pending bankruptcy proceedings.
Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213 was properly denied for failure to provide sufficient time in the notice of motion for defendants to respond. (4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac 3213.02; see also, Ross Bicycles v Citibank, 149 AD2d 330, 331.) Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.