Frederick Lashley v. Paul Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Corr. Ctr., 995 F.2d 880 (8th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Frederick Lashley v. Paul Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Corr. Ctr., 995 F.2d 880 (8th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Manney v. Monroe (ilnd, 2001-07-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Manney v. Monroe
N.D. Ill. · 2001 · confidence medium
Although a complaint may be barred by the applicable statute of limitations, Rule 15(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure creates an exception by allowing “the relation back of amendments changing or adding parties so long as no prejudice will ensue.” Woods v. Indiana Univ.-Purdue Univ. at Indianapolis, 996 *995 F.2d 880, 884 (7th Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frederick LASHLEY, Appellant,
v.
Paul DELO, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Appellee
90-1036.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Jun 22, 1993.
995 F.2d 880
Arnold, Fagg, Waters.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

ORDER

The United States Supreme Court reversed this court’s holding that the trial judge violated the Eighth Amendment by refusing to give a mitigating circumstance instruction requested by Lashley during the penalty phase of Lashley’s trial. Delo v. Lashley, — U.S.-,-, 113 S.Ct. 1222, 1226, 122 L.Ed.2d 620 (1993). The Supreme Court’s opinion, coupled with this court’s earlier opinion rejecting Lashley’s other .claims, 957 F.2d 1495 (8th Cir.1992), disposes of the case. We thus affirm the district court’s denial of Lashley’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. The mandate shall issue forthwith.