green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Gelt v. Janowitz (In Re Chisholm Co.)
But see Project 74 Allentown, Inc. v. Frost, 143 F.R.D. 77 , 83 n. 7 (E.D.Pa.1992) (Rule 11 permits a court “to sanction the individual who signed a paper on behalf of a corporation as well as the corporation itself’), aff'd, 998 F.2d 1004 (3d Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Coquico, Inc.
See Project 74 Allentown, Inc. v. Frost, 143 F.R.D. 77 , 83 n. 7 (1992), aff'd 998 F.2d 1004 (3d Cir.1993) (explaining that because Rule 11 duties are personal and non-delegable, Rule 11 permits a court to sanction an individual who signed a paper on behalf of a corporation as well as the corporation itself)- See also In re Jazz Photo Corp., 312 B.R. 524, 535 (Bankr.D.N.J.2004) (stating that a court can sanction a represented party under Rule 11 who had “direct, personal involvement” in the decisions at issue and also citing Project 74 Allentown for the proposition that an individual who s…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodgers (Robert, Stephanie)
v.
Prudential Insurance Company of America
v.
Prudential Insurance Company of America
92-7587.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 28, 1993.
Published
Rodgers (Robert, Stephanie)
v.
Prudential Insurance Company of America
NO. 92-7587
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 28, 1993
Appeal From: M.D.Pa., 803
F.Supp. 1024
1
AFFIRMED.